Supplemental Coverage Option for 2019 Crops

Contributed by Steve JohnsonFarm Management Specialist, Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, sdjohns@iastate.edu

Headshot of Steve JohnsonSupplemental Coverage Option (SCO) crop insurance was introduced in the 2014 Farm Bill but was limited to acres enrolled in the Price Loss Coverage (PLC) commodity program. SCO was not available when Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) was chosen by crop by FSA farm number. ARC was the choice for nearly 98 percent of the Iowa’s base corn acres and over 99 percent of the base soybean acres from 2014 through 2018.

As a result, SCO was not a crop insurance choice for very many farms through 2018. Similar to the 2014 Farm Bill the 2018 Farm Bill again gives farmers a choice by crop by FSA farm number to elect and enroll in either the ARC-County or the PLC program.

However, with the 2018 Farm Bill being implemented in 2019, the expectation of some experts is that many farmers will eventually enroll in the PLC program for the 2019 and 2020 crop years, especially on their corn base acres. That’s because of the potential for the PLC program to trigger payments should the final national average cash price fall below the $3.70 per bushel reference price. Enrollment in PLC will lead to more insured crop acres being eligible for the purchase of SCO. For 2019, SCO premiums appear very attractive as compared to Revenue Protection (RP) at higher coverage levels.

Coverage based on county revenue

The SCO band of coverage will be based on the county revenue given that the underlying crop insurance product is RP. SCO provides a protection in a band at an 86 percent maximum level down to the coverage level selected for RP. An example would be a farmer who selects a 75 percent coverage level for RP in addition to the SCO product. Thus, SCO could provide county-based revenue coverage from the 86 percent to the 75 percent level.

To trigger an indemnity claim, a county-based revenue must fall below 86 percent of expected revenue before SCO makes a payment. As a result, the RP-SCO combination provides mixed coverage: Farm-level coverage is provided from the RP product downward while county-level coverage provides between 86 percent and the coverage level of the RP product.

The primary disadvantage of the RP-SCO combination is that the county-level coverage may not match losses on a farm. Sometimes a farm may have a loss while SCO will not trigger a payment. It’s also possible for the farm to not have a loss while the county-based SCO product triggers a payment.

Premiums under RP-SCO combinations

The primary advantage of using SCO is a lower farmer-paid premium. The costs of an RP-SCO combination product will usually be lower than the 85 percent RP product alone for two reasons.

First, the county yields are typically less variable than the farm yields, resulting in fewer payments for a county-based product than for a farm-level product at the same coverage level. Lower payments then result in a lower premium. Second, SCO has a subsidy rate of 65 percent which is a higher than the RP at the 85 percent coverage levels using enterprise units. This 65 percent subsidy rate is higher than all subsidy levels for basic and optional units when the coverage level is above 50 percent. These government paid premiums are reflected in Table 1 below.

table showing premium assistance levels on farm-level products

Who should consider SCO?

Farmers who typically purchase RP at high coverage levels could find SCO useful, particularly if a lower coverage level is selected that might result in a lower farmer-paid premium. However, the farmer should have the intention of eventually electing and enrolling those crops on those farms in the PLC program. Farmers interested in SCO coverage for 2019 should discuss premiums and choices with their crop insurance agent before the March 15 sales closing deadline on spring planted crops.

Ag Decision Maker (AgDM) 

An agricultural economics and business website.

Ag Decision Maker September 2016 Updates

Ag Decision Maker

Business Solutions for Farms and Agribusiness from Iowa State University Extension and Outreach

September Newsletter (pdf)

New and Updated Files


Iowa Farm Outlook

Outlook Information for Crops and Livestock

September Newsletter

Livestock — Marketing Strategies for the 2016 Calf-Crop
Crops — Searching for a Price Bottom


Choices

A publication of Agricultural & Applied Economics Association AAEA

 Ag Decision Maker (AgDM) 

An agricultural economics and business website.

Why it is not OK to use NASS yields to calculate ARC-CO payments

plastina_alejandro_2014Alejandro Plastina, ISU Extension Economist, provides explanation of the yield data used in calculating ARC-CO payments in Iowa.

On February 22 2016, the USDA National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) released the final county crop production estimates for 2015: 73 Iowa counties had higher corn yields in 2015 than in 2014, 22 had lower yields, and 2015 corn yields were not reported for Mills, Monroe, Taylor, and Union County; 86 counties had higher soybean yields, 11 had lower yields, and 2015 soybean yields were not reported for Taylor and Mills County.

Knowing that higher county yields reduce the likelihood and the potential amount of ARC-CO payments, the NASS release spurred the interest of producers to recalculate their own projected ARC-CO payments for the 2015/16 crop marketing year. However, two important details often overlooked when calculating projected ARC-CO payments are (1) that county yields are determined on a per planted acre basis, as opposed to a per harvested acre basis; and (2) that the official county yields used in the final calculation of ARC-CO payments are published by USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA), as opposed to NASS.

NASS yields are calculated as production (in bushels) divided by harvested acres. Since they are not determined on a per planted acre basis, they cannot be used to calculate ARC-CO payments.

FSA yields are only available after the end of the crop year and are calculated on a per planted acre basis. Therefore, most of the difference between FSA and NASS yields is explained by failed acres. The average difference between FSA and NASS county corn yields in Iowa for 2014/15 (the only year for which both yields are publicly available), amounts to 4.75 bushels per acre.

arcco3232016In an effort to reflect the impact of failed acres on the yield used to project ARC-CO payments, the ISU Projected ARC-CO Payment Calculator uses “corrected” yields in the calculation of the 2015/16 actual county crop revenue. The “corrected” yields are based on NASS production data and obtained by dividing production (in bushels) by planted acres. For 63 Iowa counties the “corrected” yields in 2014/15 were closer to the official FSA yields than NASS yields were. For example, the corn yield used by FSA to calculate ARC-CO payments for Lyon County in 2014/15 is 149 bushels, while the NASS yield is 172.9 bushels, and the “corrected” yield is 155 bushels. The average difference between FSA and “corrected” corn yields amounted to 0.42 bushels per acre.

Judging by the release date of 2014 county yields by FSA on October 23, 2015, it can be expected that FSA will release final 2015 county yields in October 2016, at about the same time as the 2015 ARC-CO payments. Until then, the ISU ARC-CO Payment Calculator will use a “calculated” yield and projected marketing year price until the price for the marketing year is finalized the end of September.

All ISU Extension and Outreach Farm Bill decision tools are available online at: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/info/farmbill.html

Ag Decision Maker (AgDM) 

An agricultural economics and business website.

2014 Farm Bill: Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program

Contributed by Kristen SchulteFarm Business Management Specialist, Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, kschulte@iastate.edu, 563-547-3001

schultek_finalThe 2014 Farm Bill extended the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP), and the program expanded its coverage by allowing producers to purchase additional coverage. Producers have the opportunity to make this change for policies set for the 2015 crop year until January 15th, 2015.

What does NAP cover?

  • Crops (not livestock) that are commercially produced for food and fiber for which catastrophic coverage under Federal Crop Insurance is not available.
  • Losses due to damaging weather (drought, hurricane, freeze, etc.), adverse natural occurrences (volcanic eruption, flood, etc), and other adverse natural occurrences (ex. excessive heat, insect infestation, ect.).

Signing up for NAP?

  • Producers must apply by application closing date; application is completed with form CCC-471. Application closing dates may vary by crop.
  • To be eligible for NAP, producers must report crop type and variety, location of acres, producers and related shares of crop, growing practice, crop planting date, and intended use of crop commodity. After planting or harvest, producers must also report acres planted, quantity of harvest, and disposition of crop. Production records may be required by FSA.
  • Application must also include service fee. Service fee is $250 per crop or $750 per producer per administrative county. Premiums are also due if electing buy-up coverage.
  • Beginning, limited resource, and traditional underserved farmers are eligible for a waiver of the service fee and 50% premium reduction (file form CCC-860).

What are the NAP coverage levels?

  • Catastrophic Coverage (CAT) covers losses greater than 50 percent at 55 percent of the commodity price.
  • Additional coverage, with premium, is available from 50 to 65 percent in 5 percent increments for production loss at 100 percent of average market price.
  • Premiums for additional coverage is equivalent to 5.25 percent of calculated crop covered value (accounts for share of crop, eligible acres, approved yield, coverage level, and average market price)

Crop losses and NAP?

  • When a loss occurs, notify the FSA office within 15 days of the natural disaster occurrence, prevented planting due to natural influences, date damage is apparent, or normal harvest date (whichever date comes first).
  • For hand-harvested crops that require a timely assessment of loss before deterioration, notify FSA of losses within 72 hours for certain crops.
  • Losses must be verified by the producer by completing form CCC-576, additional documentation/evidence may apply.
  • Average market values are used. At the state level, FSA may set separate market prices for a crop based on represented farming practices or sales to different markets within the state.
  • Retroactive pay for 2012 NAP assistance is available for losses to fruit crops (trees or bushes) in counties that had Secretarial disaster designations due to frost or freeze are available.

Additional Information

  • Grazed acres can only participate in NAP at the CAT level; however, these acres can only participate in either NAP or Livestock Forage Disaster Assistance Program
  • Annually, payments are limited to $125,000 per individual or entity.
  • Additional information can be found at fsa.usda.gov/nap.
  • A decision tool is available through FSA and collaborating universities, http://fsa.usapas.com/

Ag Decision Maker (AgDM) 

An agricultural economics and business website.

2013 ACRE revenue shortfall triggers corn payment

Contributed by Steven D. JohnsonFarm Management Specialist, Iowa State University Extension, sdjohns@iastate.edu, 515-957-5790

Johnson_Steve_smThe Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE), a counter-cyclical program created in the 2008 farm bill has had limited participation by Iowa producers. In addition to the Direct & Counter-Cyclical Payment (DCP) programs, a producer could also enroll by FSA farm number in this new ACRE program. There was a cost of participation, as a producer was required to give up 20% of their Direct Payment (DP) annually.

The ACRE program used a combination of state average yields, farm level yields and the national marketing year average (MYA) national cash price to determine levels of revenue guarantees and payments for each covered commodity on a farm enrolled. There were two revenue triggers that had to be met annually before any ACRE payments were generated, one at the state level and one at the farm level.

The price component of both of the state and farm level triggers is the average of the two most recent USDA marketing year prices. The marketing year runs from September through August each year and uses a weighted average to determine the national cash price. The marketing year average (MYA) national cash prices for the 2011 and 2012 crops were $6.22 and $6.89 per bushel, respectively. The 2013 MYA national cash price of $4.46 per bushel was released on September 29, 2014.

2013 ACRE payment is approximately $45 per base acre for corn

To trigger a payment under ACRE the “actual” revenue for both the state and the farm must be less than their corresponding guarantees. The actual revenues are the current marketing year cash price multiplied by the state average yield and the actual farm level yield, respectively. If both triggers are reached, the payment to the farm will be the difference between the state revenue guarantee and the state actual revenue.

The payment level cannot exceed 25% of the state guarantee, however. It will also be adjusted up or down by the ratio of the farm Olympic average yield to the state Olympic average yield. For example, if the farm average yield is 10% above the state average yield, the ACRE payment will be increased by 10% for that farm. Because of this 10% limit, the state revenue guarantee for 2013 was $781. The actual state revenue was approximately $736 per acre or 165 bushel per acre state corn yield times $4.46 per bushel national cash price in 2013. This leaves a shortfall in revenue of approximately $45 per base acre of corn.

The 2013 ACRE payment was made on 85% of the farm’s base acres. However, the total planted acres that receive a payment cannot exceed the total base acres for all crops established for the counter-cyclical payments. Producers who signed up for the 2013 ACRE program did receive 80% of the direct payments that have been paid in 2013, regardless of actual prices or yields each year.

Check with your local Farm Service Agency (FSA) Office

For those 6,000 Iowa farms enrolled in the 2013 ACRE program, they were required to submit 2013 actual farm’s yields to their local FSA office by mid-July. Those same farms will still need to meet both the farm and state triggers. That payment to the farm will be the difference between the state revenue guarantee and the state actual revenue, which appears likely for corn for the 2013 crop. Since the MYA national cash price was not known until September 29, 2014, the ACRE payment is not made until October 2014. Payments to those farms enrolled and appropriate yield information is expected to be made by FSA after October 10, 2014.

Using the ACRE Payment Estimator

Iowa State University Extension created an Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) Payment Estimator, an online tool, in 2008 to assist producers as they determined if they should enroll in the ACRE program. The calculator has since been updated. You can use this same calculator now to estimate the potential 2013 ACRE payment for your farm, which appears likely for corn base acres. You can find an Information File and Decision Tool titled Average Crop Revenue (ACRE) on the Ag Decision Maker website.

For information related to the 2014 Farm Bill, visit the Ag Decision Maker Farm Bill webpage.

Ag Decision Maker (AgDM) 

An agricultural economics and business website.

Ag Decision Maker text image

Archives