Last Friday the United States Supreme Court agreed to take a case from Wisconsin that has implications for takings jurisprudence. The case is Murr v. State of Wisconsin, and the question certified for the Court is “Whether in a regulatory takings case, the ‘parcel as a whole’ concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v City of New York, establishes a rule that two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels must be combined for takings analysis purposes.”
SCOTUS accepts takings case from Wisconsin
Subscribe
Archives
Categories
Tags
2013 legislation 2015 legislation Annexation cell towers Condemnation conditional use permits Easements Equal Protection Fair Housing Act Federal 6th Circuit Federal 7th circuit Federal 8th Circuit Federal Telecommunications Act First Amendment First Amendment Freedom of Speech Introduction to Iowa Planning and Zoning for Local Officials Iowa Court of Appeals Iowa courts Iowa current news Iowa legislation Iowa Supreme Court Michigan Court of Appeals Minnesota Court of Appeals Minnesota Supreme Court Missouri Court of Appeals Nebraska Supreme Court nonconforming uses North Dakota Supreme Court Notice Nuisance Preemption procedural due process Rezoning RLUIPA Signs and billboards Smart Planning bill special assessments standing substantive due process Takings United States Supreme Court US Supreme Court Variances Wisconsin Court of Appeals Zoning board of adjustment